RESEARCH CONVERGENCE / 04 OCT 2026
Find the
common thread.
Three researchers. Parallel investigations.
A shared narrative, only as strong as its evidence.
01 / ACTIVITY IS NOT EVIDENCE
Parallel paths.
Lines connect commits from the same lane, not continuous execution. Dots show attributed commits. UTC / committer time. Independent checks below are scoped cohort audits, not new replications.
02 / THE SHARED QUESTIONS
Where the work meets.
Five themes. Each satellite is a study, review or recent lane.
Size encodes evidence tier. Dashed curves mark documented transfers between researchers.
DOCUMENTED CROSSOVERS
03 / A CLAIM THE TEAM CAN DEFEND
Three ways to tell it.
A stronger headline needs more than a big result. It needs evidence, a fit to the brief, contributions across researchers, and artifacts ready to show.
Open the scoring model Editable weights · no commit counts
Brief fit and readiness are explicit editorial judgments. Evidence takes the strongest selected artifact per represented owner, then averages across owners. Coverage is represented owners / 3. Readiness is reduced when referenced artifacts are absent. Scores are not probabilities.
03b / LANDED LATE, COUNTED ONCE
Two closeouts after the refresh window.
Neither result changes the headline score: one is a four-root pilot with an inconclusive preregistered classification, the other produced zero valid outputs. Both are shown because a missing negative is a missing receipt.
04 / FOLLOW THE THREADS
Where each person is heading.
05 / LEAVE THE RECEIPTS ATTACHED
Evidence ledger.
Scientific status comes from the registry assessment, not a green hub badge. Registry dates can lag newer post-mortems. Open the pinned source before making a launch or submission decision.